Do Bombardier bankers' have alibis for 9/11 combat support?
Open e-mail sent May 17, 2006, to:
The Right Honourable Stephen Joseph Harper
Prime Minister of Canada
Copy:
Steven Jones and Jim Fetzer,
Co-chairs of Scholars for 9/11 Truth www.st911.org/
et al.
Bcc:
Dear Prime Minister Harper:
Re: "Do Bombardier bankers have alibis for 9/11 combat support?"
We believe Bombardier's CIA private-equity bankers engaged in public-sector
procurement fraud through the Canadian Commercial Corporation and forced the
debt-laden company to conceal combat-support avionics in the tail cones of its
business jets and test these disguised avionics for 9/11-style maneuvers at the
NATO flight training school in Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan www.martec.com/aerospace-ps2.html
We ask for your governemnt's help in finding out if Bombardier's bankers - BNP
Paribas run by the Desmarais family out of Montreal and JP Morgan Chase run by
the Rockefellers out of New York - have alibis for the apparent use of
Bombardier's 'civilian' planes to fly remotely-controlled Boeing 757/767s in
the 9/11 bogus 'Global Guardian' war game attack on America?
After all the two banks led a syndicate which owned the fraudulent loans and
mortgage on a $2.8 billion Bombardier-operated NATO flight training school in
Moose Jaw, Sask., the perfect cover for CIA agents and their Canadian CSIS
counterparts to rehearse RPA* or UAV* remote-controlled assassination maneuvers
outside the scrutiny of the FBI and the RCMP.
"A CIA-controlled Predator firing a Hellfire missile was used to kill six
suspected al-Qa'ida terrorists in Yemen on November 3, 2002. The Predator ..
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) was developed .. from January 1994 to June 1996
[in] three parts: air vehicle with associated sensors and communications
equipment, ground control station, and product or data dissemination system ..
Boeing [is responsible for] data exploitation and mission planning systems." www.fas.org/irp/program/collect/predator.htm
CIA agents appear to have developed remotely-controlled assassination
technologies for the Clinton administration [a thermite bomb then a make-sure
bullet for U.S. Commerce Secretary, Ron Brown?] even though public boasting of
CIA prowess in this area only began after 9/11 to intimidate (?) the Bush White
House. www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/CRASH/BROWN/brown.html#MINE
For a Global Guardian war game alibi on 9/11, all Bombardier's bankers had to
do was have their white painted civilian jets 'capture' the autopilots of Boeing
Flights 11, 175, 77 and 93 - all having been previously modified to carry the
remotely-detonated pulse-bombs - and fly the planes along a pre-selected flight
path into their target region of interest.
In such a scenario, as soon as the 9/11 bombing mission was over, the bankers
would instruct the Bombardier combat-support jet to revert to its 'white-paint'
civilian job and take its VIP witnesses off to lunch - tables reserved of
course through the Boeing-operated Iridium satellite communications system also
in the custody of the bankers!
Should we assume that people in the plane seen by Susan Mclewain, buzzing the
murder scene where Flight 93 was blown up, left the scene of crime to avoid
being late for lunch?
"There's no way I imagined this plane .. white no markings but definitely
military, it just had that look .. two rear engines, a big fin on the back like
a spoiler on the back of a car and with two upright fins at the side. I haven't
found one like it on the internet. It definitely wasn't one of those executive
jets. The FBI came and talked to me and said there was no plane around." www.thepowerhour.com/911_analysis/flight-93-shot-down.htm
I would appreciate any help from the government in checking out the alibis of
the Bombardier bankers for predator-like killings in Yemen, Yugoslavia and, of
course, America on 9/11.
